|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Title |
UNCDF Special Projects Implementation review Exercise (SPIRE) Phase I |
| |
Client |
UNOPS |
| |
Continent |
Worldwide |
Country |
Worldwide |
| |
Service1 |
M&E |
Service2 |
|
| |
Sector1 |
Local Development |
Sector2 |
|
| |
Period |
01/2010 to 11/2011 |
| |
Euro |
594,141 |
| |
Partners |
ES Global - Canada |
| |
Description |
The Special Projects Implementation Review Exercise (SPIRE) of UNCDF projects in the Local Development and Inclusive Finance practice areas has three key objectives:
- To ensure UNCDF compliance with the mandatory evaluation requirements specified in its evaluation policy for the period 2009-2010, through an outsourced arrangement which produce high quality evaluations that contain findings and recommendations of value to stakeholders and decision-makers;
- To develop/experiment with cost-effective and rapid methods of undertaking mid-term and final evaluations in order to yield credible, effective, independent evaluations in an efficient manner.
- To connect country programme evaluations with UNCDF’S corporate strategy thereby enabling cross-country comparison and the tracking of progress towards global objectives.
In addition, the SPIRE exercise also aims at contributing to a rethinking of UNCDF’s evaluation policy in relation to accountability requirements, knowledge management potential, results-based management arrangements as well as the role of evaluation in measuring UNCDF’s capacity to leverage its funds and influence policy.
The first phase of the assignment (2010) foresees:
- The development of a methodological and conceptual framework that will combine the need to take into account the specific nature of the individual programmes with the need for cross-comparisons and trend identification between evaluation findings.
- The carrying out eight project evaluations. Of these six fall within the LD practice area (five mid-term and one final evaluation) and will focus on: support for local institutional development and capacity building, local level resources mobilization and public expenditure management; establishment of a "performance-linked" local development funding facility, support for policy development at the national level; and two fall within the Inclusive finance practice area (both mid-term evaluations) and will focus on: financial sector assessments, which diagnose and identify constraints and opportunities to enhance the participation of poor households and micro and small firms in the financial sector, on the development of nationally owned vision, strategy and action plans for inclusive financial sectors, that involve the adoption by the government of a national strategy.
The evaluation teams will assess the extent to which the programmes – through the provision of seed capital, technical support and policy advice - have contributed to the building of stronger local government systems and financial sectors so as to improve the provision of basic services and open access to economic opportunities for the poor.
It is expected that the results of the country evaluations will: i) reinforce the results of country programmes by improving their orientation, linking evaluation with IF/LD design and maintaining and building partnerships with donors and government partners for resource mobilization; and ii) contribute, individually and through comparative analysis and synthesis of findings across countries, to the assessment of their alignment and contribution to the attainment of UNCDF’s strategic objectives . |
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
Supporting Rural Development and natural resources management in NWFP (North-West Frontier Province) through capacity building and promotion of sector-wide approaches |
| |
Client |
EC Delegation in Pakistan |
| |
Continent |
Asia |
Country |
Pakistan |
| |
Service1 |
Study |
Service2 |
Advisory |
| |
Sector1 |
Rural Development |
Sector2 |
Capacity Building |
| |
Period |
05/2010 to 12/2010 |
| |
Euro |
129,915 |
| |
Partners |
Pohl Consulting (Consortium Leader-FWC BENEF Lot 11) |
| |
Description |
"The overall objective of the project was to promote sustainable development in NWFP (North-West Frontier Province) and Balochistan through capacity building for a Sector-Wide approach in rural development and Natural Resource Management (NRM), and to develop a future EC sector support strategy for RD/NRM in those provinces.
The overall project will be split up into two phases, and this assignment is part of the first phase. The main activities of this assignment are to (i) conduct a review of the public finance management systems in the RD/NRM sector and the macro-economic policies inplace, (ii) conduct a capacity assessment of this sector, (iii) formulate options and possible scenarios’s for a sector-wide approach in RD/NRM, and (iv) formulate options for support in phase II in preparation of a sector-wide approach. The outcome of this intervention, which has been the first of its kind of comprehensive analysis on SWAPs in RD/NRM in Pakistan, has provideed a basis and reference for a medium and long-term development prospectives of the sector. This has increased the optimised use and coordination of aid by donors, increasing aid effectiveness and helped stakeholders get a clearer view of the characteristics and needs of the sector.
The mission has been carried out by two experts, both provided by DRN. |
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
Study to determine the most suitable structure for the implementation of a Micro-Projects Programme.
|
| |
Client |
EC Delegation in Swaziland |
| |
Continent |
Africa |
Country |
Swaziland |
| |
Service1 |
Study |
Service2 |
|
| |
Sector1 |
Rural Development |
Sector2 |
|
| |
Period |
06/2009 to 07/2009 |
| |
Euro |
24,990 |
| |
Partners |
In assocation with Transtec (Belgium), Consortium leader, FWC lot 1 |
| |
Description |
"The global objective of the assignment was to determine the most suitable structure for the implementation of the 10th EDF Micro Projects Programme. The specific objective was to assist the Ministry of Economic Planning and Development in determining
the most suitable legal arrangement and the most suitable organisational arrangement to facilitate co-ordination and implementation of the Micro Projects Programme;
Main outputs of the mission have been the following:
• A supported recommendation in respect of the most appropriate legal structure of the MPP Co-ordination Unit, with step-by-step procedure for establishing the relevant structure;
• A supported and realistic recommendation on the organisational structure of the MPP Co-ordination Unit;
• Basic job descriptions to support the proposed organisational structure of the MPP Co-ordination Unit;
• Basic position-linked candidate profiles to support the proposed organisational structure of the MPP Co-ordination Unit. |
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
Identification study in the governance sector |
| |
Client |
EC Delegation in Swaziland |
| |
Continent |
Africa |
Country |
Swaziland |
| |
Service1 |
Study |
Service2 |
|
| |
Sector1 |
Development Aid |
Sector2 |
|
| |
Period |
08/2009 to 12/2009 |
| |
Euro |
121,684 |
| |
Partners |
ECO 3 (Consortium Leader) |
| |
Description |
The global objective of the assignment was to support the identification and preparation of the future EC support programme under the governance sector in Swaziland. The specific objective was to assess whether such support could effectively be implemented through the project approach. The identification and formulation study provided the decision makers in the Government of Swaziland and the European Commission with sufficient information to:
1. justify acceptance of the proposed intervention;
2. select the preferred option amongst different alternatives in each of the three governance categories identified, on which to base the financing and implementation of the proposed intervention;
3. for the preferred option(s), identify and argue the objectives, purpose, expected results and main activities of the proposed project; including, in consultation with stakeholders, possible benchmarks and targets for reforms which are included in the government commitments or on sectoral performance indicators;
4. Prepare complete documentation to allow for formulation of the preferred option(s) to be retained for the design of the project.
The Study produced an identification study, a programme identification fiche, a programme(s) action fiche, relevant technical administrative provisions and a detailed budget in accordance with the EDF procedures. |
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
End of Programme Evaluation of the Programme "Support to the competitiveness of the rice sector in the Caribbean" |
| |
Client |
EC Delegation to Guyana, Suriname, Trinidad & Tobago, Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles |
| |
Continent |
Caribbean |
Country |
Guyana and Suriname |
| |
Service1 |
TA |
Service2 |
|
| |
Sector1 |
Development Aid |
Sector2 |
Capacity Building |
| |
Period |
10/2009 to 11/2009 |
| |
Euro |
50,912 |
| |
Partners |
Soges (Italy), Consortium leader |
| |
Description |
The overall objective of this mission was to carry out an end of programme evaluation of the Programme “Support to the competitiveness of the rice sector in the Caribbean”, and more specifically in Guyana and Suriname, in order to assess a) whether this programme had contributed to the region’s social and economic development, by enhancing the competitive position of producers, processors, millers and others actors in the industry, as well as by improving productivity, management, research, training and marketing, and b) whether it had helped prevent the potential socio-economic deterioration resulting from the ongoing process of trade liberalisation.
The specific objective was to evaluate the Programme relative to design and implementation, relevance, efficiency of its implementation, means and costs, effectiveness, impact and sustainability, with a special attention given to these latter two factors.
The evaluators conducted interviews with members of the Contracting Authority, Deputy Regional Authorizing Officers in Guyana and Suriname, staff of the national and regional PMUs, Caribbean Rice Association, research institutions in Guyana and Suriname that were beneficiary of the Programme, representatives of commercial banks that implemented activities for the Programme commodity associations in both countries, and with any person or national/international institution active in the rice sector as deemed appropriate.
The Evaluation was carried by two international experts; DRN provided the expert number 2. |
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
Technical Assistance Support Programme to Regional Integration in Central America (PAIRCA II) |
| |
Client |
EC Delegation in Nicaragua & General Secretariat of the Central American Integration System |
| |
Continent |
Latin America |
Country |
Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panamá. Possibly Belize & Dominican Republic |
| |
Service1 |
TA |
Service2 |
Advisory |
| |
Sector1 |
Regional Integration |
Sector2 |
Capacity Building |
| |
Period |
11/2009 to 11/2014 |
| |
Euro |
1,917,250 |
| |
Partners |
College of Europe (BE), IALPA (Costa Rica & Guatemala), Agorà 2000 (IT) |
| |
Description |
Support to the regional integration process through the improvement and consolidation of the institutional system, with a view to increasing its efficiency and legitimacy vis-à-vis the Central American governments and citizens, thus paving the way for an increased participation of the latter, both in the decision-making process and in the ownership of the benefits of the integration. Institutional support to the political bodies and institutions (mainly SICA General Secretariat, Court of Justice, regional Parliament, and SICA Consultative Committee) as a way to improve their role in the implementation of the strategic agenda and to improve the adoption and effective implementation of the presidential mandates.
Long, medium and short term experts will aim at achieving the following expected results:
1. Decision-making process at regional level is reinforced and the institutional reform and architecture is enhanced
2. Regional institutions' capacities are strengthened and coordination among them, as well as their articulation with national bodies, are enhanced
3. Civil Society participation in the regional integration process is improved and exchanges of experiences between Europe and CA are promoted and effectively undertaken
4. Public awareness and academic education on regional integration is enhanced and regional integration is progressively integrated in the curricula. |
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
Technical Assistance for the Monitoring of Governance Programme in Guinea |
| |
Client |
EC Delegation in Guinea |
| |
Continent |
Africa |
Country |
Guinea |
| |
Service1 |
TA |
Service2 |
|
| |
Sector1 |
Development Aid |
Sector2 |
Capacity Building |
| |
Period |
05/2009 to 12/2010 |
| |
Euro |
199,466 |
| |
Partners |
ECO 3, Belgium |
| |
Description |
The main objective of this project was to ensure the effective execution of governance programmes et accompanying measures in favour of the Development strategy of Guinea. The specific objective was to provide Technical Assistance in Good Governance, in order to ensure the effective execution and monitoring of projects carried out in Guinea. Specifically, the TA ensured: A). The monitoring of ongoing governance programmes’ implementation: 1) Support Programme to Non State Actors (AISHA - Civil Society Support Programme, PACNOP – Support Programme to the National Confederation of Farmers’ organisations); PASEL – Support programme for the stockbreeding sub-sector); 2) Support Programme for the strengthening of the decentralisation process, which aimed at supporting the government in the implementation of the Code for local authorities; 3) PAIG – Support Programme to the Justice Sector; B.) The support to the identification and formulation phases of the governance programmes foreseen in the framework of the 10th EDF: reflexion during the elaboration, continuity with the programmes implemented in the framework of 9th EDF, etc.
Specific activities of the TA included: a) - Occasional monitoring mission and reorientation of Good governance support programmes (PACNOP, AISCHA, PASEL, support to decentralisation, PAIG); b) Evaluation of programmes or programme components and proposal of potentially needed reorientations; c) Checking of technical and administrative aspects of calls for tenders/calls for proposals; d) Support to Evaluation committees, and participation to evaluations of tenders received in the framework of calls for tenders of governance programmes funded by the NIP 9th EDF; e) Proposals for possible synergy and complementarity with other programmes; f) Contribution to the identification and formulation of the support programme to the civil society et the support programme to the decentralisation process of the 10th EDF. The AT was carried out for a total of 18 months, in several occasional missions. The team included an expert, specialist of non state actors, a civil society expert, two decentralisation experts and an expert in the Justice sector. Four of the five experts were provided by DRN. |
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
Sector Policy Support Programme (SPSP) - Formulation Study |
| |
Client |
EC Delegation in Bolivia |
| |
Continent |
Latin America |
Country |
Bolivia |
| |
Service1 |
Study |
Service2 |
|
| |
Sector1 |
Development Aid |
Sector2 |
|
| |
Period |
04/2009 to 06/2009 |
| |
Euro |
59,970 |
| |
Partners |
ATOS Origin (Belgium), Consortium Leader |
| |
Description |
The National Indicative Programme (NIP/RIP) adopted by the European Commission in July 2007 has foreseen EC support to Bolivia's policies for employment creation and income generation. Within the framework of this Indicative Programme, a sector policy support programme has been developed with an allocation of € 23M for the government's sector plan for productive development.
“Production with more and better employment”. The purpose of this study was to provide support to the devolved government implementing institution PROBOLIVIA in the operational definition of the components of the sector plan targeted for EC support.
To that end the study has provided the necessary inputs to:
1) prepare an Action Fiche and the Technical and Administrative Provisions of the Financing
Agreement on which to base the financing and implementation of the proposed programme;
2) prepare a complete documentation to allow for the sound implementation of the programme based on good practices.
In particular, the following inputs have been provided:
a) a detailed logical framework in cascade for the various components of the programme;
b) a realistic and justified budget and implementation calendar
c) the definition of implementation responsibilities, including potential inter-institutional relations, also with sub-national levels;
d) an institutional needs assessment in relation to the implementation of the support programme;
e) the definition of target groups of the productive development components;
f) an outline of the functioning of grant funds in line with EC procedures;
g) the nature and scope of register and of business development services, and relation with existing entities;
h) baseline values and target values of the set of indicators, including the applicable EuropeAid
Standard Indicators;
i) a proposal for a result oriented monitoring system, based on existing public and private data sources.
j) a proposal for the incorporation of adequate environmental indicators and criteria, to be used for the monitoring and performance assessment of the SPSP.
Aspects concerning possible negative environmental impacts on the sector itself or on other environmentally sensitive sectors have been considered, as well as the selection of adequate support actions for environmental capacity building/institutional strengthening.
The study was carried out by a team of 2 international experts, both provided by DRN.
|
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
Technical Assistance Support to Food Security for Ultra-Poor (FSUP) |
| |
Client |
European Commission |
| |
Continent |
Asia |
Country |
Bangladesh |
| |
Service1 |
TA |
Service2 |
|
| |
Sector1 |
Rural Development |
Sector2 |
Capacity Building |
| |
Period |
01/2009 to 01/2013 |
| |
Euro |
1,473,686 |
| |
Partners |
In association with Agriconsulting, Italy (Leader) |
| |
Description |
The main objective of the Food Security for Ultra-Poor Programme (FSUP) is to contribute to the reduction of extreme poverty and food insecurity of the most vulnerable women and their dependants, with special attention to the development of their capacities, the establishment of means for income generation and the promotion of household food security. The FSUP calls for the implementation of safety net type initiatives, mainly targeting rural ultra poor women, using successfully tested innovative approaches, and relying on the work of local NGOs (implementing partners).
The overall objective of this Technical Assistance is to provide support to the FSUP in order to maximise its effectiveness, impact and sustainability. A specific Programme Coordination Unit (PCU) has thus been set up, aiming at providing assistance mainly in the fields of programme coordination and M&E. The main tasks of the PCU include: i) to coordinate and monitor the interventions to be implemented under the FSUP; ii) to organise and manage external mid-term reviews and final evaluations of the above interventions; iii) to follow up implementing partners’ annual internal audit recommendations and provide support for their timely implementation; iv) to provide support to the programme partners implementing FSUP, in order to ensure effective and timely implementation and achievement of anticipated results and impact; v) to establish links between the FSUP interventions and other EC food security interventions, so as to maximise the exchange of best practices and lessons learned.
The following results will be achieved through the Technical Assistance's work:
• Effective programme monitoring systems developed and applied, and reporting done timely according to requirements;
• The various FSUP interventions share their experiences and benefit from these exchanges, as well as from exchanges with other similar interventions;
• Mid-term reviews and final evaluation missions take place on a timely basis and produce quality results. Recommendations from such missions are followed up;
• Audit reports recommendations are followed-up;
• Implementing partners are assisted for timely preparation of planning documents and periodic reporting;
• Visibility of EC and FSUP interventions is enhanced, through communication, publications and organization of workshops and events.
The PCU office has been staffed with an expatriate coordinator and a national team consisting of two M&E Specialists, a Financial Specialist, a Visibility & Communication Specialist and an MIS Expert (in addition to an Administrative Assistant and an Office Assistant/Messenger). The inclusion of such a team of national experts (all provided by DRN) is seen as an essential element to guarantee the achievement of the Technical Assistance’s objectives and results. |
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
Evaluation of the ROSS programme |
| |
Client |
Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Directorate General for Development Cooperation |
| |
Continent |
Mediterranean Basin |
Country |
Lebanon |
| |
Service1 |
M&E |
Service2 |
|
| |
Sector1 |
Development Aid |
Sector2 |
|
| |
Period |
02/2009 to 05/2009 |
| |
Euro |
109,280 |
| |
Partners |
Agora'2000 - Italy |
| |
Description |
Evaluation of the ROSS programme – phase I. The ROSS programme is a post-emergency programme with a budget of € 15 million aimed at strengthening local development capacities by: i) supporting the rehabilitation of basic infrastructure services, ii) increasing the capacity of local authorities to deliver basic educational and health services; iii) supporting the re-establishment or creation of productive activities through the provision of goods (agricultural goods & tools, livestock, kits for the set-up of individual activities) as well as technical assistance and training. The programme was implemented through 58 projects managed either by Italian NGOs or directly by the ROSS programme structure, in collaboration with local partners and national counterparts.
The evaluation was carried out on two main levels: 1) at programme level: where the team assessed the relevance of the programme as well as the efficiency and effectiveness of the mechanisms and tools put in place, including coordination activities provided by the ROSS programme structure; 2) at project level, where the team concentrated on the assessment of the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of a sample of the specific actions put in place. This has allowed the team to provide findings, conclusions and recommendations that can be used for both the ongoing phase II of the ROSS programme in Lebanon and general recommendations aimed at improving the use of the programme as an instrument to provide development aid during emergency or post-emergency situations.
|
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
Technical Assistance to the NAO Office |
| |
Client |
EC Delegation in Jamaica |
| |
Continent |
Caribbean |
Country |
Belize |
| |
Service1 |
TA |
Service2 |
|
| |
Sector1 |
Capacity Building |
Sector2 |
Development Aid |
| |
Period |
02/2009 to 09/2009 |
| |
Euro |
194.020 |
| |
Partners |
In association with Transtec, Belgium (leader FWC lot 1) |
| |
Description |
The overall objective of the project was to assist the office of the NAO (National Authorising Officer) in managing development assistance, by establishing a framework for the efficient use of EC resources.
The intervention specifically aimed at:
1. assisting the NAO’s office in the review of submissions by the Banana Support Programme and other projects, in the preparation of Tender Dossiers, and in general project implementation and monitoring;
2. increasing the capacity of the NAO’s office in the design, formulation and appraisal of programmes/projects, and in the implementation and monitoring of projects (Project Cycle Management), according to Budget and EDF procedures;
3. increasing the capacity of the NAO to cope with the volume of financial and administrative tasks related to project implementation.
4. increasing the capacity of the NAO, the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of Works in the use of EDF procedures and Budget Line Procedures.
The TA supported and enhanced the capacities of the NAO's office and of the line Ministries involved in the implementation of EC Programmmes in Belize to better manage Budget and EDF development assistance.
The TA was carried out by one technical assistant provided by DRN. |
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
Trade Needs Assessment |
| |
Client |
EC Delegation in Egypt |
| |
Continent |
Africa |
Country |
Egypt |
| |
Service1 |
Study |
Service2 |
|
| |
Sector1 |
Regional Integration |
Sector2 |
|
| |
Period |
02/2009 to 02/2009 |
| |
Euro |
51,694 |
| |
Partners |
In association with Pohl Consulting and Associates (Consortium Leader FWC Lot 11) |
| |
Description |
The overall objective of the mission was to promote deeper economic integration between Egypt and the EU in the area of international trade in goods and services. The specific objectives of the mission were to:
- provide a factual assessment of the ongoing trade related cooperation (EC-Egypt) and identify Egypt’s trade and trade related assistance needs, including the area of industrial policy.
- define a set of concrete proposals for technical assistance intervention (to be financed out of the NIP 2010 or thereafter), taking into account the requests for twinning already put forward by the Ministry of Trade and Innovation (MTI).
The study was divided in two phases:
Phase 1: Review and discussion with the MTI and the European Commission about the needs assessment conducted by the MTI in 2008, and the requests for twinning that submitted by the MTI. This included gathering information on how the needs assessment had been conducted and how the requests had been collected, on the number of stakeholders involved and the relation between the assessment outcomes, the requests for assistance, and ongoing trade and trade-related policies.
Phase 2 : Following the first review phase, the team analyzed in details the institutional and regulatory framework of Egypt’s trade and related sectors and identified specific knowledge and/or institutional gaps to be presented and discussed in their final trade needs assessment report.
The study was carried our by a team of two experts. The industrial policy expert was provided by DRN. |
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
Development and Implementation of a European Commission Visibility Strategy for Ethiopia |
| |
Client |
European Commission |
| |
Continent |
Africa |
Country |
Ethiopia |
| |
Service1 |
Advisory |
Service2 |
|
| |
Sector1 |
Development Aid |
Sector2 |
|
| |
Period |
01/2009 to 10/2009 |
| |
Euro |
138,336 |
| |
Partners |
In association with ECO3 (Belgium), leader of the FWC lot 7 |
| |
Description |
The general objective of this assignment is to develop and implement a visibility strategy of the development cooperation between Ethiopia and the EC. The focus of this strategy is on communicating the “what, where, why, how and who” of the government of Ethiopia and EC work, the results achieved and stories of the actual benefits to the target beneficiaries. In addition, the strategy intends to highlight the coordination taking place between the work of the government and the EC with other bilateral (specifically, EU Member States) and multilateral donors and implementing bodies.
The expert is charged to:
i. undertake a SWOT analysis of the existing EC visibility work in Ethiopia (gathering and reviewing existing visibility materials produced by the Delegation).
ii. identify the key audiences and their “needs”, inter alia the Ethiopian Government, project beneficiaries, donors and NGOs operating in Ethiopia, EU taxpayers and EC HQ in Brussels.
iii. define the key messages that needed to be conveyed (how lives have actually been improved on the ground, how the EC works with other donors, the effects of EC contributions, relationship between the EC and the NAO, etc.).
iv. identify a basket of new visibility products and develop new and innovative ideas for products to be contained in the basket.
Specific activities and outputs included:
- Liaison with publishing / PR /audio-visual companies
- Identification of actions to be taken in order to raise visibility
- Identification of products
- Identification of audience, language, and delivery channel(s) for each product in the basket
- Design and identification of the contents of a standard “info pack”
- Definition of audio-visual material: brochures, leaflets, containing details of individual programmes/projects; posters, quarterly newsletters; flyers for distribution in local newspapers; other audio-visual material (e.g. short films on EC projects for compilation on a DVD; short advertising spots on EC work for broadcast on TV; radio reports); or events (e.g. music events and related sponsorship materials; sporting events); give-aways; branding slogan.
The assignment is being carried out by one Communication and Media expert, provided by DRN.
|
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
Evaluation of the European Commission’s Co-operation with Tunisia- Country Evaluation |
| |
Client |
European Commission |
| |
Continent |
Mediterranean Basin |
Country |
Tunisia |
| |
Service1 |
M&E |
Service2 |
|
| |
Sector1 |
Development Aid |
Sector2 |
|
| |
Period |
12/2008 to 12/2009 |
| |
Euro |
165,000 |
| |
Partners |
Leader of Lot 4: DRN
Evaluation Manager: DRN
Consortium: DRN-ADE-PARTICIP-DIE-ODI-EIAS-ICEI
|
| |
Description |
The scope of the evaluation is the Commission’s co-operation with Tunisia and its implementation in the period 1995-2008.
The two main objectives are:
• to provide a global and independent assessment of the EC cooperation with Tunisia;
• to provide recommendations in order to improve future Commission's cooperation strategies and programmes.
The evaluation will assess:
• the relevance and the coherence of the Commission's cooperation strategies for the period 1995-2008;
• the consistency between programming and implementation for the same period;
• the implementation of the Commission’s co-operation, focusing on the effectiveness and efficiency for the period 1995-2008, and on intended effects for the current programming period (2007-2013).
Focus sectors of the evaluation will include: macroeconomic support, private sector development, social sectors (education, health, employment, vocational training), rural development, media, and justice; environment, good governance and human rights, gender equality will also be addressed as cross-cutting issues.
|
| |
| Top |
| |
Title |
Implementation of the JEU approach in the field of budget support operations' evaluation. Study related to the cooperation between the EC and Tunisia |
| |
Client |
EC |
| |
Continent |
Mediterranean Basin |
Country |
Tunisia |
| |
Service1 |
M&E |
Service2 |
|
| |
Sector1 |
Development Aid |
Sector2 |
|
| |
Period |
12/2008 to 12/2009 |
| |
Euro |
185,000 |
| |
Partners |
Leader of Lot 4: DRN
Evaluation Manager: DRN
Consortium: DRN-ADE-PARTICIP-DIE-ODI-EIAS-ICEI
|
| |
Description |
The main objectives of the evaluation are:
• To test the methodological approach for the evaluation of Budget Support Interventions, both general and sectoral, published on the Evaluation Unit website.
• To complete the Tunisia country level evaluation with an ad-hoc assessment of the Budget Support interventions carried out in the country.
The interventions object of the evaluation will be related to:
• General Budget Support: FAS I, II, III, IV (1996-2007)
• Sectoral Budget Support: Support to the modernisation of higher education; support to the reform of the secondary education; support to the sector of vocational training.
|
| |
| Top |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© Copyrights 2004. DRN. All Rights Reserved. | Site Designed & Developed by: Milagro Interactive |
|
|
Presentazione
Advanced Search
